Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Don Firineach's avatar

A clear attempt, using both terrorism and military might, at regime change in The Islamic Republic of Iran failed. The Iranians stood firm, notwithstanding the loss of key senior military and scientific personnel. The response to the Zionist entity was highly effective and demonstrated the ability to crush it in a war of attrition - hence the 'direct' entry of the US to save it. ISI wisely decided not to enter a full scale war with the US on this occasion - but it is also evident that further attempts at regime change will occur.

The solidarity witnessed will stand it in good stead for the future and both Russia and China will now enter further strategic discussions in preparation. As The Supreme Leader noted - any attack will result in a corresponding response and while the IRI gains strength and respect the Zionist entity has presented its "glass jaw", and its genocidal intent, to the rest of the world. 1953 it ain't.

Expand full comment
susan mullen's avatar

I thought Khamenei was going to cite Trump's bragging that "his" bombing of Iran was similar to Truman dropping two nuclear bombs on Japanese civilians in 1945: "Stressing that "monumental damage" was done to Iran, Trump said: "That hit ended the war. I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki. But that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war."

He made similar remarks at a separate news conference later that day.

Trump said, "When you look at Hiroshima, if you look at Nagasaki, that ended a war, too." He added, "This ended a war in a different way."" Democrats will probably retake the House in 2026 so they'll likely impeach him again.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts