Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gerrard White's avatar

!Thanks for this report on Rostec: it is interesting how open the company is as per defence work production increases, and intriguing to see how discreet the Chairman takes care to be in his report to VVP

The report is encouraging, especially as regards import substitution

Chemezov spoke more freely to the RBC back in May, especially on the margins problem

– from the interview with RBC

https://www.rbc.ru/interview/economics/17/05/2024/664215389a7947dc93772782#toc-772782-9

“Rostec has been trying to position itself as a “pro-commercial state partner” for many years. But you yourself admitted that “now the state defense order prevails, at best we work at zero, if not at a loss. This is the demand of the times.” How long do you allow the state corporation to operate without profit? What is the current financial safety margin?

- Of course, we will talk about this with the Ministry of Defense and the new minister, because profitability needs to be increased. Otherwise, we won't last long. I think the minister will hear us, he is an economist.

Although in China the competitive commercial environment has reduced margins to 2%, this margin in only obtained by Rostec due to exports and civilian work at much higher, the level of investments required in Rostec’s sectors, as well as the pre dominance of Defence work means that the company wishes that Belousov is a reasonable man as far as allowing sufficient margins for re investments

— Rostec today meets 80% of the army's needs [in weapons], which are involved in the Air Defense Forces. The Ministry of Defense's task is to obtain high-quality and effective weapons; economics is the tenth thing for the military. Of course, we have accumulated a huge number of problems in this area. The profitability of our production today is only 2.28%.

- Should there be?

— At least 5%, and generally from 5 to 10%. It is difficult to develop with the current profitability rate. We create new modern equipment only if the Ministry of Defense allocates direct funding for R&D or R&D. Without this, many enterprises are in a state of "just surviving."

“Therefore, we want to meet with the new minister [of defense] and talk about calculating the cost of contracts not from the achieved cost price, but rather giving the opportunity to preserve the funds that the enterprise has saved for some period. And these funds should be used to develop production, to create new modern equipment.”

Even the Jamestown irredentists found it hard to pick holes in the report, although they did their very sullen best

https://jamestown.org/program/rostec-2023-financial-data-illustrates-state-of-russian-military-industrial-complex/

Expand full comment
Lantern Dude's avatar

Looks like I'm number 50 on the comment count.

Regarding the use of the word 'forced'. Not sure if it's a machine translation but if so it could be interpreted as 'obliged' or 'obligated'. Interesting article and comment section.

Expand full comment
48 more comments...

No posts