Discussion about this post

User's avatar
richardstevenhack's avatar

My take on climate change is very simple: I'm not a climatologist - and neither is anyone else except professional climatologists. So we know nothing but what the consensus is.

I happen to think that scientific consensus is still the only valid path we have to understanding reality - no matter how many times they get it wrong. And they do get it wrong - frequently. But people who cherry-pick their opposition to the consensus on a given topic are doing so for their own emotional reasons, which are a mix of paranoia and ego-boo ("I'm the only one who sees how this is wrong - because I'm so smart and I can read papers put out by people with crap degrees!"), mostly the latter (notice how these morons gleefully denounce anyone who doesn't believe as they do as "part of the conspiracy".)

The one thing I do believe about the state of the climate is that, if it's true that there is a serious problem, one thing we can count on is that the fractious nature of humans and the state will prevent a solution from being found before they're forced to. But once they're forced to, humans will adapt to the situation. Humans survived ice ages, they can survive this crap, too.

Also keep in mind that part of the "divide and conquer" strategy is bringing up issues just like this and using them to justify further encroachment on people by the state and corporations. And it works because most humans think in binary terms - "either this or that" - and never once consider either a third path or that they've misidentified the entire problem.

This is why I stay out of climate change discussions. Almost everyone discussing it is not qualified to do so, and the ones that are don't agree. So we should let them fight it out and in the meantime concentrate on what we can do personally to be ready for anything that comes.

Expand full comment
Colin Brace's avatar

> markets will remain markets and perform their economic function, but their purpose is to serve humanity first

Much of the conventional criticism of socialism is that everything is supposedly planned and there are no markets as such. Obviously this is nonsense; the key insight here is that markets are human constructs (not natural phenomenon) and needs to be managed as such. A century or so of libertarian ideology has blinded so many people to this fact.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts