Over the past weekend and Monday, a trilateral meeting with leaders of Japan and South Korea was held in Seoul, South Korea, that prompted Global Times to publish two reports about, “China, S.Korea, Japan to resume FTA negotiations; Premier Li calls for upholding spirit of ‘strategic autonomy’” and “S.Korea ‘rushes to report’ outcome of meeting with China to the US, reflecting diplomatic immaturity: experts.” The meeting reflects the fact that relations between the three are not as strained as Western media suggest while genuine commercial interactions remain very strong and affect what happens politically. The two reports are quite good and provide some excellent information some readers may have forgotten or never knew. Both clearly show Outlaw US Empire policy hold over Japan and South Korea isn’t as strong as portrayed. Missing from both however is the impact of North Korean development on East Asian relations. The first order of business for China is to revive the trilateral free trade treaty negotiations that will further supplement the already existing Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) that involves the ASEAN plus Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand. The Outlaw US Empire would like to break up all this commercial interaction that drives increasing and improving political relations between all participants, although its actions are counter to the national interests of all members. So, enough preamble; here’s the first article:
Chinese Premier Li Qiang said on Monday at a trilateral meeting with leaders of Japan and South Korea which was held in Seoul, South Korea, that the three countries should stay committed to the original aspiration for cooperation and make joint efforts to resume and accelerate China-Japan-South Korea cooperation so as to make greater contributions to regional prosperity and stability.
Li made the remarks at the ninth Trilateral Summit Meeting among China, Japan and South Korea, where Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol attended, the Xinhua News Agency reported.
Chinese analysts said the three major economies in East Asia are trying to resume the trilateral cooperation from the fields of economy, trade and cultural exchanges where the three countries share broad common interests and similarities, while lay aside the difference in other tough topics including historic and sovereignty issues, as well as ideological differences.
Li also said at the meeting that the three countries should regard each other as partners and opportunities for development, and uphold economic globalization and free trade.
South Korean media Yonhap News Agency reported on Monday that the trilateral session discussed ways to promote cooperation in six specific areas - economy and trade, sustainable development, health issues, science and technology, disaster and safety management, and people-to-people exchanges.
The leaders also agreed to institutionalize the trilateral cooperation by holding the trilateral summit and ministerial meetings on a regular basis. Monday's session was the first three-way meeting since December 2019 after it was suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic and historical disputes among the three Asian neighbors, said Yonhap. After the meeting, the three leaders attended a trilateral business summit at the Korea Chamber of Commerce & Industry.
Mao Ning, a spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said at a press conference on Monday that on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the establishment of the trilateral cooperation mechanism, it is of great significance to hold the trilateral leaders' meeting again, marking "the restart of trilateral cooperation."
FTA negotiations
At the meeting, the Chinese premier called on the three countries "to deepen economic and trade connectivity, maintain the stability and smoothness of the industrial chain and supply chain, and resume and complete the negotiations of the China-Japan-South Korea free trade agreement (FTA) as soon as possible," Xinhua reported.
The three leaders agreed to resume talks on a three-way FTA, which were suspended in November 2019 following 16 rounds of official negotiations after they began in 2012. The leaders committed to ensure the "transparent, smooth and effective" implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). It is an FTA among 15 Asia-Pacific countries, involving the three nations, Yonhap reported on Monday.
China is the largest trading partner of South Korea and Japan, and together, they make up about 25 percent of the global gross domestic product and 20 percent of global trade.
Resuming China-Japan-South Korea FTA negotiations will help the three countries give full play to their economic complementarity, strengthen trade and investment cooperation and achieve foreign trade and economic growth against the backdrop of sluggish world economic growth and rising geopolitical tensions, Zhang Jifeng, a senior research fellow at the Institute of Japanese Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Monday.
"This is a good start for the China-Japan-South Korea economic and trade relations that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic and geopolitical conflicts over the past several years," Zhang said. There is great potential for the three countries to deepen cooperation in a variety of sectors including the digital economy, green economy, as well as industrial and supply chains, he added.
Zhang urged Japan and South Korea to refrain from following the US' unilateral moves aimed at containing China so as to maintain their own interests and jointly strive for stability and prosperity in Asia.
Mutually needed
Chinese analysts refuted certain Japanese media outlets' reports alleging that China has called for the restart of the FTA due to a "weakened economy," and stressed that China aims to make contributions to regional and global economic stability and recovery.
China's economic growth reached 5.3 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, signaling a stable economic rebound ahead. And, the country itself is a massive market. Once an FTA is reached, it will further strengthen trade and investment, bringing material benefits to companies and people from the three countries and contribute to economic integration, according to Zhang.
If the Japanese media said China's economy is "weakened" and is reaching out for help from Japan and South Korea, they should better look at Japan's data as the Japanese economy shrank 2 percent in the first quarter, said Chinese experts. According to Japanese media Kyodo News and CNN, Japan's economy contracted in the first quarter, squeezed by weaker consumption and external demand and throwing a fresh challenge to policymakers as the central bank looks to lift interest rates away from near-zero levels.
Preliminary GDP data from the Cabinet Office of Japan earlier this month showed Japan's economy shrank 2.0 percent annualized in the January to March months from the prior quarter, faster than the 1.5 percent drop seen in a Reuters poll of economists. Downwardly revised data showed GDP barely grew in the fourth quarter.
South Korean economic performance is better than Japan's, as it grew at the fastest pace in more than two years in the first quarter beating all estimates with a pick-up in domestic consumption and robust exports, but the market questioned if the recovery was sustainable, Reuters reported.
South Korea's GDP for the January-March quarter was 1.3 percent higher than the preceding three months on a seasonally adjusted basis, the sharpest expansion since the fourth quarter of 2021, data from the Bank of Korea showed.
Da Zhigang, director of the Institute of Northeast Asian Studies at the Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Monday that due to the impact caused by the Ukraine crisis and the following impacts on the global supply chain, all major economies around the globe are facing challenges, and the fact is that China, Japan and South Korea need each other despite that they have disputes and historic issues.
Strategic autonomy
The Chinese premier stressed that China, Japan and South Korea should uphold the spirit of strategic autonomy, maintain bilateral relations, promote a multipolar world, and oppose playing bloc or camp politics.
At the meeting, Li called for opposing turning economic and trade issues into political games or security matters, and rejecting protectionism as well as decoupling or the severing of supply chains.
The US has strong influences over Japan and South Korea, and this makes the two East Asian economies very difficult to push regional economic integration with China as Washington wants Tokyo and Seoul to serve its hegemonic purpose to contain China, said experts. But the experts also said that leaders from Japan and South Korea understand that bloc confrontation will only make the region more unstable and this will only bring disaster to everyone in the region.
Lü Chao, an expert on the Korean Peninsula at the Liaoning Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Monday that "The US is with no doubt the biggest obstacle for the China-Japan-South Korea cooperation. Washington sees Tokyo and Seoul as its followers, and it will surely get upset when its two allies engage with its top competitor."
"The Japan-US and South Korea-US alliances are not based on equal relations, which are different from their ties with China. We hope Japan and South Korea can act like independent countries and make decisions based on their own national interests and the shared interests of the region," he noted. [My Emphasis]
And here’s the second article:
As the curtain fell on the ninth Trilateral Summit Meeting among China, Japan and South Korea on Monday in Seoul, the South Korean ministry of foreign affairs announced that South Korea, the US and Japan would hold a trilateral vice foreign ministerial meeting in Virginia, US on Friday.
It is likely that South Korean officials will share and report on the just-concluded China-Japan-South Korea trilateral summit meeting during the upcoming talks with the US, its most important military ally, according to Chinese observers. However, they also pointed out that the deliberate arrangement also reflected Seoul's diplomatic immaturity.
Per South Korea's Yonhap News Agency, South Korean Vice Foreign Minister Kim Hong-kyun, Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell of the US and Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Masataka Okano are set to attend the trilateral dialogue in historic Little Washington, Virginia, on Friday.
The US State Department referred to the upcoming dialogue as "a key deliverable from the historic 2023 Camp David Summit," adding that the three countries will reaffirm the importance of trilateral cooperation in advancing a free and open, connected, prosperous, secure, and resilient "Indo-Pacific region."
According to an official release for the upcoming three-way dialogue, it will focus on utilizing collective capacity to strengthen cooperation on economic security, critical and emerging technologies, and maritime security, as well as a range of regional and global challenges, including the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Straits, and humanitarian support for the people of Gaza.
The last meeting between vice foreign ministers of the US, Japan and South Korea took place in February 2023.
Lü Chao, an expert on the Korean Peninsula affairs at the Liaoning Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Tuesday that the purpose of the US-Japan-South Korea trilateral meeting is twofold: for the US, it is to strengthen its control over Japan and South Korea, and for Japan and South Korea, it is to demonstrate their stance and communicate with the US.
The US' intention to dominate this meeting and reinforce the so-called "Camp David mechanism" is clear to all, Lü said.
The US is supposed to be among the countries most concerned with the China-Japan-South Korea summit meeting. On the day the meeting concluded, Seoul announced the trilateral meeting with the US, Japan, in a move intended to highlight its unique position and role between China and the US, while showcasing the current government's diplomatic achievements, and demonstrating to the US that it has not leaned toward China, Dong Xiangrong, a senior research fellow at the National Institute of International Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Tuesday.
However, Dong noted that such approach is not very effective. Dong explained that the US is not particularly worried that South Korea would tilt toward China on the back of one single meeting, nor would it value South Korea more because of such a hasty declaration of loyalty. "On the contrary, it might arouse concerns in China about China-South Korea relations due to South Korea's eagerness to declare its stance to the US."
It also reflected the current South Korean government's diplomatic immaturity, exposing a significant gap from President Yoon Suk-yeol's vision of becoming a "global pivotal state," Chinese observers said.
China needs to be aware that the communication and meeting mechanisms among US, Japan, and South Korean leaders, ministers, and deputy ministers are far more frequent and in-depth compared to those among China, Japan, and South Korea, they cautioned.
The nature of US-Japan-South Korea cooperation is fundamentally different from China-Japan-South Korea cooperation. The US has a security alliance with Japan and South Korea, covering military security, economic, social, and ideological aspects, whereas China and Japan, as well as China and South Korea, are merely partners, with frequent disputes, they pointed out.
China's goal is not to compete with the US but to emphasize that US-Japan-South Korea cooperation should not target China and should not harm China's national interests, just as China-Japan-South Korea cooperation does not target other parties, Dong noted.
China, Japan and South Korea share common interests in stabilizing regional situations and promoting regional economic prosperity and development, and the three parties are cooperating based on these common interests. South Korean and Japanese government should cherish the positive momentum in improving ties with China after the latest summit meeting, observers said. [My Emphasis]
Unfortunately, the Outlaw US Empire can’t get out of its own way when it comes to making rational policy that would actually advance its own interests as it has a myopia that sees everything through what it calls a “security” lens. The weakness of Japan’s economy is very important as it’s also experiencing a demographic crisis which is directly related. Just as Japan needs Russian energy it needs China as a trade and investment partner, not as an adversary. The same can be said about Japan’s relations with North Korea, but its policy is hostage to the Empire’s hostile intents towards North Korea, although Japan has shown more independence in its relations with China. One can also see why Russia wants to increase its ties to ASEAN as that gives it an opening to the RCEP. That also shows the reasoning behind the Outlaw US Empire’s actions to try and forestall such happenings. IMO, the level of trade integration within Asia is too high for both Japan and South Korea to jettison in favor of an Eastern NATO bloc as their economies and thus their societies will suffer greatly. That assessment is based on what the trilateral summit accomplished and the state of the three political-economies. One main reason for the South Korean economy’s recovery is the infusion of dollars into its MIC for arms to be sent to Ukraine, but that won’t last much longer, so a broader recovery is needed for real growth to resume. Japan’s Neoliberal economy is dying for several reasons, which are also driving its demographic crisis. Japan doesn’t need to worry about China; it needs to worry about itself.
*
*
*
Like what you’ve been reading at Karlof1’s Substack? Then please consider subscribing and choosing to make a monthly/yearly pledge to enable my efforts in this challenging realm. Thank You!
a fascinating article karl.. thank you... a scary thought for the usa - that china, japan and south korea would start exchanging in their local currencies and avoid the us$....
the fact is, it is hard to make and maintain walls that are meant to separate people who live in the same region... it is the same deal trying to create a wall thru nato with russia and europe... of course all this serves the usa/uks banking and other purposes, but it is fated to not last as i see it... it will take some time.. world leadership, especially in the west and some of these asian countries, are looking for leadership in all the wrong places - the usa is not a place to look for this!! and this is especially true at this time!!
divide and conquer only goes so far until people see how they are being used and develop a resentment and resistance towards this same game plan when they become more fully aware of it..
China's pragmatic approach to countries with which it has important economic ties is logical and commendable; however, the historic strategic choices bearing down on the ROK and Japan are extraordinarily difficult and complex.
When Korea's students overthrew Syngman Rhee in 1960, followed by a brief democratic interlude swiftly snuffed out by Pak Chung Hee's coup and subsequent military rule, the ROK's GDP per capita was c.$100! Now, it's close to $60,000 (PPP). This incredible transformation was achieved (sometimes in spite of US interference as was the case when Pak began his rule) under the umbrella of the ROK's alliance with the US. US troops have been in South Korea since the Korean War (1950-3) and there's no sign of them leaving; after coming to the DPRK's aid in 1950, China's forces left North Korea in 1958.
Opinion polls in the ROK (of which there are many) consistently show that a clear majority of South Koreans support the ROK-US Alliance. There are currently c. 28,000 US troops permanently stationed in South Korea and this number is increased considerably for the joint annual military exercises to rehearse war with North Korea.
Korea is a small country and has been presented with difficult choices in the past when the geostrategic situation in Northeast Asia has changed - this time, in the context of national division, its choice is more difficult than ever.