Crooke, and Baker are being overrated and their accuracy exaggerated here. eg "....it seems probable that he is referring to the 1970s era of the Trilateral Commission and the Club of Rome."
That is not probable. 99.9% chance baker was talking about the last 4+ years and that's it. Like biden and harris, and baker, crooke has nothing cohe…
Crooke, and Baker are being overrated and their accuracy exaggerated here. eg "....it seems probable that he is referring to the 1970s era of the Trilateral Commission and the Club of Rome."
That is not probable. 99.9% chance baker was talking about the last 4+ years and that's it. Like biden and harris, and baker, crooke has nothing coherent or accurate to say here about anything. None are the wiser after reading his articles which go in circles. as does the i'view with the judge. What does he say? Can anyone offer a summary of his major compelling conclusions they didn't already know beforehand?
Crooke, and Baker are being overrated and their accuracy exaggerated here. eg "....it seems probable that he is referring to the 1970s era of the Trilateral Commission and the Club of Rome."
That is not probable. 99.9% chance baker was talking about the last 4+ years and that's it. Like biden and harris, and baker, crooke has nothing coherent or accurate to say here about anything. None are the wiser after reading his articles which go in circles. as does the i'view with the judge. What does he say? Can anyone offer a summary of his major compelling conclusions they didn't already know beforehand?
I agree. Dont think, Bakers perspective of deceit goes beyond the current presidency. The blame will be laid at Bidens feet, and that's it.