Ismaele is correct about Article 4 of Russia's NATO security agreement/treaty of Dec 2021. Furthermore Karl, you are wrong again. Russia has indeed repeatedly referred to the Dec 2021 treaties as a basis for a long-term settlement of the Ukraine issue. It - Russia's security arrangements with the US/Nato and Ukraine not being in Nato in …
Ismaele is correct about Article 4 of Russia's NATO security agreement/treaty of Dec 2021. Furthermore Karl, you are wrong again. Russia has indeed repeatedly referred to the Dec 2021 treaties as a basis for a long-term settlement of the Ukraine issue. It - Russia's security arrangements with the US/Nato and Ukraine not being in Nato in any form as per the Dec 2021 proposals - is intrinsically tied to any conclusion of the Ukrainian SMO. From Putin's announcements of the SMO in Feb 2022 all through to now. I suggest your "interpretations" on several aspects is faulty here.
Regarding "The intent now is to supplant NATO with the Eurasian Security Structure that will be constructed. That's the new mojo." That is an unrealistic fantasy only very myopic and naive would imagine possible in the next two decades, and probably many more.
Ismaele is correct about Article 4 of Russia's NATO security agreement/treaty of Dec 2021. Furthermore Karl, you are wrong again. Russia has indeed repeatedly referred to the Dec 2021 treaties as a basis for a long-term settlement of the Ukraine issue. It - Russia's security arrangements with the US/Nato and Ukraine not being in Nato in any form as per the Dec 2021 proposals - is intrinsically tied to any conclusion of the Ukrainian SMO. From Putin's announcements of the SMO in Feb 2022 all through to now. I suggest your "interpretations" on several aspects is faulty here.
Regarding "The intent now is to supplant NATO with the Eurasian Security Structure that will be constructed. That's the new mojo." That is an unrealistic fantasy only very myopic and naive would imagine possible in the next two decades, and probably many more.