Abbas mandate as "president" expired over a decade ago. He is maintained in place by the Israeli occupation forces.
In the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority is fighting alongside Israel against Palestinian Resistance members. Palestinian Authority checks for IEDs prior to Israeli army entering Palestinian towns and villages, arrests Palestinians wanted by Israel, and provides human intelligence to Israeli occupation forces.
Karl posted an interview of Lavrov a couple of days ago. He laid out Russia's essential role in the UN right from the start and the US/UK efforts to break up Russia. I learned a lot from that interview. How many years will it be until USA learns about even this: the UN has been an instrument of USA domination of the global order?
In a way the Gaza genocide may be a blessing because it has clearly shown the RoW that US has selective moral principles. We can turn them on when we want to, or we can turn them off anytime.
In Karl's substack before this one "Energy Cooperation in a Multipolar World -- Russia's energy theme week" Putin said the unsayable: the US is no longer competitive. Michael Hudson's theme of debt holds as the US extraction of internal resources such as housing, student debt, medical debt, credit card debt, and the environment, all this has made the base living cost too high for US to be competitive.
And the wounded beast is lashing out. And Russia's slow moves, and their genuine concern for the rule of law, is shown ever more brightly as a contrast to the West. Or should I put it in lower case, the west?
There will be no world war: We are already immersed in it! The question is how far it will go. Let those who are believers pray because we are on the edge of the abyss.
Lavrov should also point the finger at the neocons around (and including) Biden. When people like Ritter utter stupid stuff like "the US doesn't want a wider war", I ask: "Who is 'the US', paleface?" The only faction that counts in the US administration are the neocons.
People are also making the mistake that just because the Pentagon appears to have put its foot down on the notion of launching long-range missiles into Russia - because they are rightfully afraid of WWIII - that does not apply to the Middle East. So believing that the US general who visited Israel twice in one week was there to tell Netanyahu that the US wouldn't back a ground invasion into Lebanon - at the same time sending a battalion of the 101st Airborne to prepare the ground for the arrival of the entire Division - is delusional, another cover story. But most of the "analysts" including Ritter, Macgregor, Wilkerson and others appear to have bought into it.
The Pentagon is not afraid of Lebanon, or Syria (except for the Russian presence there), or Iraq, or Yemen, or Iran. They will be perfectly happy to send whatever ground troops are needed into the first four, although they can't with Iran due to the size of the Iranian militia (one to ten million men). When the time comes, they will send as many troops as they can scrape together in the Middle East (an estimated 40,000) plus more from the US as available to Israel and stage from there into Lebanon. This won't happen immediately, they will rely on air and naval power first, but everyone knows that's not going to work, so ground troops will be absolutely necessary, no matter what the military analysts say.
The same applies to Israel. They can genocide from the air as many Lebanese as they want, but the only way to get those displaced Israeli back to the north is to go in on the ground. And once that happens and they get their asses kicked, which they will, they will beg the US for ground troops and they will get them. Anything is hopium delusion.
I agree that Lavrov needs to take off the gloves, and he knows that diplomatic language is lost on the US and Israel, but he still persists and that's because they're not ready for the second part - taking action. Unlike the US which bypassed the UNSC and did as it pleased with impunity the Russians and Chinese have a solid case to do likewise, and take action. They'll never be in a position to get through to the west's powerless populations, so why bother. The global majority will see and understand; at least those without those western rose coloured spectacles.
Anyone have info if the so called reported US anger at NataSatan resulted in him cutting his trip short. Like did they pull security off him, and he had no other way but the airport? I thought he had some lap dogs at cap hill, that lick his A$$ everytime he came
This is war against humanity,,, sooner or later the hot war will hit everyone, incl Rusia, China etc. It is better to confront now than later
TY for this informative update re UN happenings. I share your frustrations w/ Lavrov / Russia ... Zionist Crusades is spot on. !!
Thank you Mr. Sanchez.
I'm afraid like you that Lavrov, Putin, Russia, China don't realize that the CW is at war with them.
Letting the Zionists/Ukranians commit war crimes/genocide with hardly any pushback is not
a recipe for achieving peace.
It's time for the resistance to send a message that enough is enough.
The Pentagon, bless 'em', has done all the limit setting it is allowed as part of serving its civilian masters.
Nothing can be said or will be said until after the election, which now indirectly includes a referendum on Ukraine, at least.
Abbas mandate as "president" expired over a decade ago. He is maintained in place by the Israeli occupation forces.
In the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority is fighting alongside Israel against Palestinian Resistance members. Palestinian Authority checks for IEDs prior to Israeli army entering Palestinian towns and villages, arrests Palestinians wanted by Israel, and provides human intelligence to Israeli occupation forces.
USA is a slow learner.
Karl posted an interview of Lavrov a couple of days ago. He laid out Russia's essential role in the UN right from the start and the US/UK efforts to break up Russia. I learned a lot from that interview. How many years will it be until USA learns about even this: the UN has been an instrument of USA domination of the global order?
In a way the Gaza genocide may be a blessing because it has clearly shown the RoW that US has selective moral principles. We can turn them on when we want to, or we can turn them off anytime.
In Karl's substack before this one "Energy Cooperation in a Multipolar World -- Russia's energy theme week" Putin said the unsayable: the US is no longer competitive. Michael Hudson's theme of debt holds as the US extraction of internal resources such as housing, student debt, medical debt, credit card debt, and the environment, all this has made the base living cost too high for US to be competitive.
And the wounded beast is lashing out. And Russia's slow moves, and their genuine concern for the rule of law, is shown ever more brightly as a contrast to the West. Or should I put it in lower case, the west?
Need a diagram? The creature showed it when it talked. The destruction of Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine.
There will be no world war: We are already immersed in it! The question is how far it will go. Let those who are believers pray because we are on the edge of the abyss.
Agree completely.
Lavrov should also point the finger at the neocons around (and including) Biden. When people like Ritter utter stupid stuff like "the US doesn't want a wider war", I ask: "Who is 'the US', paleface?" The only faction that counts in the US administration are the neocons.
People are also making the mistake that just because the Pentagon appears to have put its foot down on the notion of launching long-range missiles into Russia - because they are rightfully afraid of WWIII - that does not apply to the Middle East. So believing that the US general who visited Israel twice in one week was there to tell Netanyahu that the US wouldn't back a ground invasion into Lebanon - at the same time sending a battalion of the 101st Airborne to prepare the ground for the arrival of the entire Division - is delusional, another cover story. But most of the "analysts" including Ritter, Macgregor, Wilkerson and others appear to have bought into it.
The Pentagon is not afraid of Lebanon, or Syria (except for the Russian presence there), or Iraq, or Yemen, or Iran. They will be perfectly happy to send whatever ground troops are needed into the first four, although they can't with Iran due to the size of the Iranian militia (one to ten million men). When the time comes, they will send as many troops as they can scrape together in the Middle East (an estimated 40,000) plus more from the US as available to Israel and stage from there into Lebanon. This won't happen immediately, they will rely on air and naval power first, but everyone knows that's not going to work, so ground troops will be absolutely necessary, no matter what the military analysts say.
The same applies to Israel. They can genocide from the air as many Lebanese as they want, but the only way to get those displaced Israeli back to the north is to go in on the ground. And once that happens and they get their asses kicked, which they will, they will beg the US for ground troops and they will get them. Anything is hopium delusion.
"And even though that's so damned obvious, Lavrov and others can't bring themselves to utter that word and tell it like it is.,"
Does he really have to? Everybody there knows exactly who he's talking about. Personally, I like his classy approach.
I agree that Lavrov needs to take off the gloves, and he knows that diplomatic language is lost on the US and Israel, but he still persists and that's because they're not ready for the second part - taking action. Unlike the US which bypassed the UNSC and did as it pleased with impunity the Russians and Chinese have a solid case to do likewise, and take action. They'll never be in a position to get through to the west's powerless populations, so why bother. The global majority will see and understand; at least those without those western rose coloured spectacles.
Good read, and analysis Mr Sanchez!.
Anyone have info if the so called reported US anger at NataSatan resulted in him cutting his trip short. Like did they pull security off him, and he had no other way but the airport? I thought he had some lap dogs at cap hill, that lick his A$$ everytime he came