Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The hatter's avatar

Thank you for this post. I appreciate the details and the work required to produce it. It appears that Russia has a longer (20+ years) and more comprehensive planning regime than the west does.

But, I do have a serious concern. Fossil fuel deposits are finite, and while the US and Russia have abundant production of oil and gas, those reserves aren't going to last forever. US oil production is probably near the peak and gas is probably only a decade behind. Russian oil and gas have a few decades on the west before peaking. Both have at least a century, probably more, of coal production.

But, sooner or later, the fossil fuels will run out. And, before that happens, they will run low and start putting strain on the economy. The US has decided to ignore this problem. Do you have any sense of how Russia is approaching it?

Expand full comment
John Bouchard's avatar

Russia got it right.. In comparison Trumps Drill baby Drill cant happen without massive energy infrastructure development such as electric transmission and NG pipe lines much of which is in poor repair resulting in higher utility bills for years to come.

Then there is the massive energy requirements for Jumpstarting Trump grandiose re-development of American industrial manufacturing base and the now new planned nuclear mega power stations for AI.

Its all hyperbole considering todays Net Zero carbon restrictions mandates and years of neglect in domestic energy planning and bureaucratic red tape all of which are huge obstacles in obtaining today's energy needs that could be met through nuclear or NG or both.

Unfortunately due to political polarization america is still currently in deadlock and in a dismal predicament in comparison to what is happening around the world.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts