Not many globally know about the Strategic-Culture Foundation web portal, although I’ve been citing material its published for well over eight years, mostly sharing it with Moon of Alabama readers.
I have spent at least 3 hours per day on the "pandemic" over the last three years.
I am glad to see Karl addressing the issue from the point of view of Strategic Culture
My favorite site is flccc.net founded by outstanding ER doctors. One of my favorite substacks is
A Midwestern Doctor with the title The Forgotten Side of Medicine
I don't have a background in medicine, biochemistry, microbiology, and previously spent little time on nutrition.
As doctors turn from treating disease to health, I have followed with intermittent fasting, diet change, a form of PT for my scoliosis, exercise, etc. And have found sources of treatment for Alzheimer's, cancer, heart disease etc. that are outside the standard medical treatments. Without the "pandemic" I would never have learned how corrupt the entire medical field is.
It was Merrill Nash's appearance on flccc.net weekly update almost 2 years ago when I realized, that what has happened is murder.
I just joined this substack so I will be around in comments as time permits.
Thanks for your replies Don. With all the information sources available today, no one has any excuse to be ignorant about how their body works and how numerous things from our environment interact with it. The idea that prions "revolt" and cause the plaque that induces Alzheimer's is both crazy and fascinating. During my 1998-99 Winter break, I stayed on campus to teach myself the basics of microbiology and began with Margulis's "Microcosmos" which was a revolutionary revelation for me and still is for many even with it nearing 40 years of age. The entire concept of Gaia which is now Earth Systems Theory I knew from Lovelock's books well before it went mainstream. Currently, my focus is on educating people about Russia, China and the Multipolar World Movement, but at some point that will pass and something new will become my primary focus, although I don't see that happening anytime soon.
That explains pulling Strategic Culture. Thank you Karl.
My wife has been informing me of the genocide meme for a long time. As a former academic researcher she performed drug trials for FDA approval for twenty years. My ears still ring from her daily updates on the rMNA disasters.
The MoA pushing the covid con turned me off the site, I only returned when the Ukraine war started. At the time I asked how a site that decries the MSM being liars and propagandists would suddenly believe them about what was likely a new flu strain rather than a deadly pandemic. Sad how a little fear can turn even a good blog into a tool for expanding globalist propaganda.
I see even now in the Australian Senate little appreciated politicians are exposing the covid lockdowns as a fraud and the vaccine as more dangerous than the virus itself, MoA should be ashamed of succumbing to fear mongering. There are reasons why I knew what I was talking about.
I also regularly read Strategic Culture, trust it will pop up again somewhere. Ah, just saw the Jo Blo post with the new link. Thanks.
It seemed clear that b and MoA was repressed during Covid as reasoned discourse was killed and still remains somewhat taboo on that topic. I wrote on it early on during Trump's non-response at my VK. I see it as the last victory for the Establishment Narrative and its heralds.
They should have gotten off of Wordpress long ago. It's a very controlled operation. You can feel it when you use it, but I also I read some in-depth articles years ago. They should move to Substack. At some point they will all get throttled, but at least not yet here.
This experience of Fuellmich not being able to make any headway in the Courts parallels the Trump election team from October to December 2020 and thereafter. Of 63 cases brought, only 3 went into Court (and they won two but they were small jurisdictions I think). Over a thousand sworn affidavits from election workers all over the country, including dozens in Fulton County for example, were not submitted as evidence in a Court of Law. Those Legislatures which had hearings with presentation of such evidence as they had gathered in only 30 days and who came away convinced were unable to make headway with the Governors, both Democrat and Republican, and so on. When they started the process in Congress on January 6th to have two-hour debates following a challenge raised by both a House Representative and Senator, a staged ''insurrection' interrupted that proceeding which was never later resumed after the riot, so the electoral vote count was made and Biden was President and Pious Pence has been lying about his role ever since (saying he was asked 'to overturn the election}. In other words, the Way Was Shut in US electoral processs just as it was Shut for Fuellmich in his attempt to bring truth into the public square about Covid.
I do not believe this similarity of concerted blocking action is a coincidence.
What it means in the case of the US is that it is now officially a post-constitutional republic, a situation perhaps even more flimsy, constitutionally speaking, than 1917 Russia. Except in this case there hasn't been a public revolution, rather a slow, deceptive coup. And the public seems blissfully unaware, most pundits too. Very strange. And dangerous.
Given Fuellmich's experience in Europe which regularly praises itself for being so much better at this sort of thing than the cowboy West USA, it seems not premature to conclude that Europe is in the same boat as the their American cousins. Western nations are all floating listlessly in the dark having witnessed the sinking of the Titanic, their old civilization, except in this case without any sure sign that any sort of help is on the way; on the contrary, indications are that things are going to get far, worse.
Signs of resistance arose with that Oliver Anthony song though as you pointed out Karl the way Youtube is facilitating it raises questions. But there is no denying the song is great, and his recent speech to his followers in his truck reveals an extremely intelligent, articulate person. No wonder he writes such good songs. They are resonating world wide and that resonance itself is revealing core societal fault lines shared by most people world wide, namely the divide between We the People and the leadership-authority-regimes under which we all live and feel increasingly short changed. As the totalitarian screw is tightened, so will more resistance emerge.
I believe that We the People will win through in the end, but as both the French and Russian revolutions demonstrated in spades, a very high percentage of the population might find themselves dying prematurely before any sort of good outcome is realized.
I love Substack but don't know its future. Makes sense to have a self-controlled wordpress site too. But hosts and domain registrars can be a problem e.g. NameCheap is Russophobic.
thank you, karl. i am one of the many moa readers that benefitted from your labours posting the complete SC essay on moa. it was deeply appreciated, each & every time, & often i refrained from clogging an important & deep thread with remarks of gratitude rather than contributing facts & news & hoped that you knew & appreciated how important your labours were for so many of us. here in canada the troubles began with covid but also with ms chung's essays delving into chyrstia's nazi background. our government is very sensitive about that. thank you again.
Response to Karl Sanchez's "Why Was Strategic-Culture's Plug Pulled?" Substack post.
I instantly dismiss all of this. Until I see a study, done by someone who is not compromised - such as the Chinese - which establishes beyond all doubt that the INCIDENCE of negative vaccine effects are EXCESSIVE over any other vaccine programs in history, I call bullshit.
ALL vaccines are going to kill SOMEONE. ALL medical treatments are going to kill SOMEONE.
I follow Professor Eric Topol (quoted in MoA during the pandemic). He publishes a Substack called "Ground Truths" which I recommend and is on Twitter. He published a post citing two studies which directly addressed the issue of "cariovascular events" which is one of the things everyone cites about the alleged dangers of the pandemic. What those studies showed was that if you had Covid-19 you had a somewhat elevated chance of having a cardiac event in the future. If, however, you had taken the vaccine, you had a slightly LESS chance of having a cardiac event.
The problem with "excess mortality" studies is that a lot of it is hand-waving. The world has just been - and still is - going through a major medical pandemic in which the virus is till mutating - as Topol describes frequently - as well as major economic changes as a result of that and other economic factors. There is going to be an obvious impact on death rates as a result.
The point is I said above: Until someone who is not politically compromised - and BOTH sides on these issues are politically compromised - does an independent study with proper controls which takes into account more factors than just how many people dropped dead from a specific cause after being vaccinated and establishes that despite all such factors the death rate has increased SIGNIFICANTLY ENOUGH to be considered a deliberate culling of the population - then this is all bullshit.
The fact that this is bullshit is immediately derived from linking random scientific studies of unknown quality - have you or I vetted the "1,000 studies"? Thought not... - to the random pronouncements of some rich morons who have an agenda for everything they say. Said agenda is usually precisely to foment a fracturing of the population into social followers and conspiracy theorists.
And even supposedly smart people (e.g., Gonzalo Lira and Glenn Greenwald) fall for this trick every single goddamn time.
I sat through all this bullshit at MoA all during 2020. I'm not going to waste time revisiting it.
We have no idea of the nature of the evidence compiled. I trust the author and his argument's sound. As I wrote, if the case is so wrong, why not admit it to court, slay it, and be done with it? My question--Why was SCF shutdown as soon as it published "The Education of Dr. Fuellmich"?--SCF published far more harsh articles aimed at the Outlaw US Empire and wasn't decapitated. I'm looking at the cause->effect action caused by the specific content. Somebody had a reason for ordering the hit. Burying the content seems the most likely answer.
I should add to that the fact that in current culture "cancellation" means "total cancellation". SCF may have published more harsh articles but very likely those articles were not on the same level as the pandemic, which has been a total social furor for three years. This is far different from bitching about Ukraine or police violence or a lot of other issues which for most people are irrelevant to them. The pandemic hit everyone one way or the other - medically, economically, socially - so naturally anyone who opposes the mainstream thought promoted by the PTB are going to be shut down more swiftly than someone writing about a topic that 99% of the population couldn't care less about.
So as I said, I'm not at all surprised at the reaction.
He was shut down for the very simple reason that he was in opposition to the dominant narrative. Obviously. Is this a surprise to you? It's not a surprise to me.
What it does not do is establish absolutely anything with regard to the underlying issue as to 1) whether the vaccine is causing deaths, or 2) whether those deaths are in excess of normal vaccine-related deaths, and 3) whether those deaths were intentional on the part of the vaccine creators and/or the companies involved.
See my response to James for why this sort of situation arises and why it is a trap to fall into believing one side or the other is correct absent sufficient personal research.
It never WILL establish anything if you don't allow it to be laid out and adjudicated, that's the point. I don't understand the tendency to make a mad dash for a conclusion without even having seen the evidence.
You completely missed the point. Go back and read my post. Then read my response to James. Your inability to comprehend what I said is precisely why I dislike being involved in discussions of this sort of conspiracy theory.
"You admit to not having any figures..." Dude--the CDC published a plethora of VAERS figures. As a STEM Graduate, I'm familiar with this sort of thinking--attack someone based on whatever you find convenient. "Conspiracy theory"? Are you some sort of troll? If there was a 'block' button in here, you'd be the first recipient I ever had to use it on.
Pssst….there is a block option here, but it doesn’t block you from seeing a person’s posts. It only keeps them from replying to you. I too wish it was more effective.
So the " sudden death" that has swept the globe , reports of young people dying in record numbers, young athletes dropping like flies , are just what? incidental to you?
you're very cynical richard.. there is a place for that and maybe it is here.. i am not sure.. i know someone directly affected by the vaccine and it involves the heart... that is not a study, but i know he has had confirmation of this from the doctors... i don't know what the % of people affected adversely by the vaccine, but i do believe it is much higher then previous vaccine rates.. that is alarming in itself, but it is kept quiet for the public.. this also explains all the censorship... how do you blow that off here? you haven't acknowledged any of it in your commentary..
I remember a medical student I knew referred to "anecdotal - i.e., worthless - evidence." A basic problem with most people these days is that they no longer - if they ever did - have any concept of either "evidence" or "proof." As far as I can remember, such concepts are never taught in any educational setting outside of STEM courses, and certainly not in the lower grades. So we have a population that can't imagine what these concepts are and are incapable of using them properly.
You just said "you don't know what the % of people affected adversely by the vaccine" but then said "I do believe it is much higher than previous vaccine rates."
There are two problems with those statements:
1) You admit not having any figures. despite that, you believe something to be true. One has to then ask: based on what, if not figures? Articles like these - which also never cite any figures?
2) If it is true that the rate is higher than previous vaccines, it does not then follow either that this is not offset by the number of lives saved from death by the vaccines - in which case it can be argued that the increased risk is justified - or that the vaccines were engineered with the intent of increasing death by vaccine.
As I have to keep pointing out to people, "connect-the-dots evidence" is not actual evidence. It is speculation. It may be speculation worthy of investigation, but it is not evidence and it is not proof.
As an example, Mercouris the other day listed a series of events involving Putin doing this and that and then Prigozhin ends up dead. He points out that you could interpret those Putin events as all being connected to Prigozhin's death - and many people are. But he also correctly noted that they prove absolutely nothing because they could all have equally prosaic explanations which, in the absence of Prigozhin's death, would have been explained as something entirely different. Mercouris, as a lawyer, understands the distinction between evidence and proof - even though most lawyers exist to blur and degrade those distinctions in favor of their client.
This is the fundamental flaw in all conspiracy theories. But these days everyone is so wrapped up in social media and thus trying to prove that they are intellectually superior to everyone else - a basic human drive - that they decide the best way to do that is to latch on to some idea (either their own or more likely someone else's since most of these people are incapable of coming up with their own ideas by definition) which is in opposition to the mainstream social thought of the day. Then they cherry-pick their facts from a few people with ostensibly valid credentials - who have the exact same agenda as they do, i.e, inflate their own importance for personal reasons - to support these notions. Then the notion gets picked up by a bunch of other people who are desperate for validation - and Wallah! We have QAnon, or Russiagate, or "Ukraine is winning".
And the people who are running things in this world just love this shit because it fractures the population into warring factions that can be manipulated by their emotions.
So the MSM seizes on one side or the other - whichever has the ostensible support of the PTB - and cancels anyone who is on the other side. So then everyone who is on that other side screams, "See, the cancellation is proof the notion is true!"
No, it's not. It's just another binary-thinking, "either-or" load of bullshit which is far away from the facts of the situation. If you come down on one side or the other without having adequate facts to base your opinion on, you become just another manipulated chimpanzee.
Climate change is another such control operation. I have no idea whether climate change is real because I'm not a climatologist - and neither is anyone else who isn't a climatologist or at least hasn't done their own extensive research into the subject.
Don't fall for this shit, James. Or do, I couldn't care less.
I should make this a Substack post... I'll add it to my post idea list since it's very important.
It’s people like you that give the globalists cover for what they are doing. You seem to be absolutely certain that the vaccines are totally safe and yet there have been numerous studies that show that they are actually killing and injuring people. I don’t know your bonafides that allow you to have a closed mind and not even consider the possibility that what they found in his mock trial was right.
You say that the studies were bogus and there is no evidence, but did you bother to look at this link? Lots of studies for you to look at.
the problems would be resolved if i was able to share the brent weinstein interview with steve kirsch and robert malone from 2020 i think where they lay out the stats on vaccine in a very clear and thorough manner and show that these mrna vaccines didn't respect the very low threshold that had been in place for many years on 'do no harm' and that type thinking.. just because i can't recite the shit here doesn't disprove what i am saying.. you're good with words richard, but you are sometimes lacking in imagination and unwilling or unable to consider a different viewpoint if it doesn't come in a nice package with all the details you demand... this is another result of youtube censorship... you really ought to be sensitive to this issue, but again for whatever reason, you are skipping over the role censorship has in all of this here...
yes, do make a substack post and we can continue the conversation there! cheers james
As was pointed out by a commenter on MoA earlier, 'Strategic Culture.su' gets you there.
'SouthFront.press', likewise.
Thank You karlof1 and MoA for doing what you do so well.
That link broken too, so here it is - https://strategic-culture.su/
And 'The Education of Dr. Fuellmich' is https://strategic-culture.su/news/2023/08/23/the-education-of-dr-fuellmich/
i like your pointed questions at the end of the article karl.. thanks for highlighting this..
I have spent at least 3 hours per day on the "pandemic" over the last three years.
I am glad to see Karl addressing the issue from the point of view of Strategic Culture
My favorite site is flccc.net founded by outstanding ER doctors. One of my favorite substacks is
A Midwestern Doctor with the title The Forgotten Side of Medicine
I don't have a background in medicine, biochemistry, microbiology, and previously spent little time on nutrition.
As doctors turn from treating disease to health, I have followed with intermittent fasting, diet change, a form of PT for my scoliosis, exercise, etc. And have found sources of treatment for Alzheimer's, cancer, heart disease etc. that are outside the standard medical treatments. Without the "pandemic" I would never have learned how corrupt the entire medical field is.
It was Merrill Nash's appearance on flccc.net weekly update almost 2 years ago when I realized, that what has happened is murder.
I just joined this substack so I will be around in comments as time permits.
Thanks for your replies Don. With all the information sources available today, no one has any excuse to be ignorant about how their body works and how numerous things from our environment interact with it. The idea that prions "revolt" and cause the plaque that induces Alzheimer's is both crazy and fascinating. During my 1998-99 Winter break, I stayed on campus to teach myself the basics of microbiology and began with Margulis's "Microcosmos" which was a revolutionary revelation for me and still is for many even with it nearing 40 years of age. The entire concept of Gaia which is now Earth Systems Theory I knew from Lovelock's books well before it went mainstream. Currently, my focus is on educating people about Russia, China and the Multipolar World Movement, but at some point that will pass and something new will become my primary focus, although I don't see that happening anytime soon.
That explains pulling Strategic Culture. Thank you Karl.
My wife has been informing me of the genocide meme for a long time. As a former academic researcher she performed drug trials for FDA approval for twenty years. My ears still ring from her daily updates on the rMNA disasters.
The MoA pushing the covid con turned me off the site, I only returned when the Ukraine war started. At the time I asked how a site that decries the MSM being liars and propagandists would suddenly believe them about what was likely a new flu strain rather than a deadly pandemic. Sad how a little fear can turn even a good blog into a tool for expanding globalist propaganda.
I see even now in the Australian Senate little appreciated politicians are exposing the covid lockdowns as a fraud and the vaccine as more dangerous than the virus itself, MoA should be ashamed of succumbing to fear mongering. There are reasons why I knew what I was talking about.
I also regularly read Strategic Culture, trust it will pop up again somewhere. Ah, just saw the Jo Blo post with the new link. Thanks.
It seemed clear that b and MoA was repressed during Covid as reasoned discourse was killed and still remains somewhat taboo on that topic. I wrote on it early on during Trump's non-response at my VK. I see it as the last victory for the Establishment Narrative and its heralds.
They should have gotten off of Wordpress long ago. It's a very controlled operation. You can feel it when you use it, but I also I read some in-depth articles years ago. They should move to Substack. At some point they will all get throttled, but at least not yet here.
This experience of Fuellmich not being able to make any headway in the Courts parallels the Trump election team from October to December 2020 and thereafter. Of 63 cases brought, only 3 went into Court (and they won two but they were small jurisdictions I think). Over a thousand sworn affidavits from election workers all over the country, including dozens in Fulton County for example, were not submitted as evidence in a Court of Law. Those Legislatures which had hearings with presentation of such evidence as they had gathered in only 30 days and who came away convinced were unable to make headway with the Governors, both Democrat and Republican, and so on. When they started the process in Congress on January 6th to have two-hour debates following a challenge raised by both a House Representative and Senator, a staged ''insurrection' interrupted that proceeding which was never later resumed after the riot, so the electoral vote count was made and Biden was President and Pious Pence has been lying about his role ever since (saying he was asked 'to overturn the election}. In other words, the Way Was Shut in US electoral processs just as it was Shut for Fuellmich in his attempt to bring truth into the public square about Covid.
I do not believe this similarity of concerted blocking action is a coincidence.
What it means in the case of the US is that it is now officially a post-constitutional republic, a situation perhaps even more flimsy, constitutionally speaking, than 1917 Russia. Except in this case there hasn't been a public revolution, rather a slow, deceptive coup. And the public seems blissfully unaware, most pundits too. Very strange. And dangerous.
Given Fuellmich's experience in Europe which regularly praises itself for being so much better at this sort of thing than the cowboy West USA, it seems not premature to conclude that Europe is in the same boat as the their American cousins. Western nations are all floating listlessly in the dark having witnessed the sinking of the Titanic, their old civilization, except in this case without any sure sign that any sort of help is on the way; on the contrary, indications are that things are going to get far, worse.
Signs of resistance arose with that Oliver Anthony song though as you pointed out Karl the way Youtube is facilitating it raises questions. But there is no denying the song is great, and his recent speech to his followers in his truck reveals an extremely intelligent, articulate person. No wonder he writes such good songs. They are resonating world wide and that resonance itself is revealing core societal fault lines shared by most people world wide, namely the divide between We the People and the leadership-authority-regimes under which we all live and feel increasingly short changed. As the totalitarian screw is tightened, so will more resistance emerge.
I believe that We the People will win through in the end, but as both the French and Russian revolutions demonstrated in spades, a very high percentage of the population might find themselves dying prematurely before any sort of good outcome is realized.
I love Substack but don't know its future. Makes sense to have a self-controlled wordpress site too. But hosts and domain registrars can be a problem e.g. NameCheap is Russophobic.
thank you, karl. i am one of the many moa readers that benefitted from your labours posting the complete SC essay on moa. it was deeply appreciated, each & every time, & often i refrained from clogging an important & deep thread with remarks of gratitude rather than contributing facts & news & hoped that you knew & appreciated how important your labours were for so many of us. here in canada the troubles began with covid but also with ms chung's essays delving into chyrstia's nazi background. our government is very sensitive about that. thank you again.
Response to Karl Sanchez's "Why Was Strategic-Culture's Plug Pulled?" Substack post.
I instantly dismiss all of this. Until I see a study, done by someone who is not compromised - such as the Chinese - which establishes beyond all doubt that the INCIDENCE of negative vaccine effects are EXCESSIVE over any other vaccine programs in history, I call bullshit.
ALL vaccines are going to kill SOMEONE. ALL medical treatments are going to kill SOMEONE.
I follow Professor Eric Topol (quoted in MoA during the pandemic). He publishes a Substack called "Ground Truths" which I recommend and is on Twitter. He published a post citing two studies which directly addressed the issue of "cariovascular events" which is one of the things everyone cites about the alleged dangers of the pandemic. What those studies showed was that if you had Covid-19 you had a somewhat elevated chance of having a cardiac event in the future. If, however, you had taken the vaccine, you had a slightly LESS chance of having a cardiac event.
The problem with "excess mortality" studies is that a lot of it is hand-waving. The world has just been - and still is - going through a major medical pandemic in which the virus is till mutating - as Topol describes frequently - as well as major economic changes as a result of that and other economic factors. There is going to be an obvious impact on death rates as a result.
The point is I said above: Until someone who is not politically compromised - and BOTH sides on these issues are politically compromised - does an independent study with proper controls which takes into account more factors than just how many people dropped dead from a specific cause after being vaccinated and establishes that despite all such factors the death rate has increased SIGNIFICANTLY ENOUGH to be considered a deliberate culling of the population - then this is all bullshit.
The fact that this is bullshit is immediately derived from linking random scientific studies of unknown quality - have you or I vetted the "1,000 studies"? Thought not... - to the random pronouncements of some rich morons who have an agenda for everything they say. Said agenda is usually precisely to foment a fracturing of the population into social followers and conspiracy theorists.
And even supposedly smart people (e.g., Gonzalo Lira and Glenn Greenwald) fall for this trick every single goddamn time.
I sat through all this bullshit at MoA all during 2020. I'm not going to waste time revisiting it.
We have no idea of the nature of the evidence compiled. I trust the author and his argument's sound. As I wrote, if the case is so wrong, why not admit it to court, slay it, and be done with it? My question--Why was SCF shutdown as soon as it published "The Education of Dr. Fuellmich"?--SCF published far more harsh articles aimed at the Outlaw US Empire and wasn't decapitated. I'm looking at the cause->effect action caused by the specific content. Somebody had a reason for ordering the hit. Burying the content seems the most likely answer.
I should add to that the fact that in current culture "cancellation" means "total cancellation". SCF may have published more harsh articles but very likely those articles were not on the same level as the pandemic, which has been a total social furor for three years. This is far different from bitching about Ukraine or police violence or a lot of other issues which for most people are irrelevant to them. The pandemic hit everyone one way or the other - medically, economically, socially - so naturally anyone who opposes the mainstream thought promoted by the PTB are going to be shut down more swiftly than someone writing about a topic that 99% of the population couldn't care less about.
So as I said, I'm not at all surprised at the reaction.
He was shut down for the very simple reason that he was in opposition to the dominant narrative. Obviously. Is this a surprise to you? It's not a surprise to me.
What it does not do is establish absolutely anything with regard to the underlying issue as to 1) whether the vaccine is causing deaths, or 2) whether those deaths are in excess of normal vaccine-related deaths, and 3) whether those deaths were intentional on the part of the vaccine creators and/or the companies involved.
See my response to James for why this sort of situation arises and why it is a trap to fall into believing one side or the other is correct absent sufficient personal research.
It never WILL establish anything if you don't allow it to be laid out and adjudicated, that's the point. I don't understand the tendency to make a mad dash for a conclusion without even having seen the evidence.
So...all the VAERS studies--by the CDC no less--which admit adverse reactions to the alleged vaxx...is somehow wrong?
You completely missed the point. Go back and read my post. Then read my response to James. Your inability to comprehend what I said is precisely why I dislike being involved in discussions of this sort of conspiracy theory.
"You admit to not having any figures..." Dude--the CDC published a plethora of VAERS figures. As a STEM Graduate, I'm familiar with this sort of thinking--attack someone based on whatever you find convenient. "Conspiracy theory"? Are you some sort of troll? If there was a 'block' button in here, you'd be the first recipient I ever had to use it on.
Pssst….there is a block option here, but it doesn’t block you from seeing a person’s posts. It only keeps them from replying to you. I too wish it was more effective.
Click on the person’s name and see the options.
As I said, you're clueless about what I'm talking about. That makes you the troll.
I'm muting this thread.
Unencumbered by the thought process is the realm occupied by you.
WRT "I'm muting this thread." Good, it feels like 'spamming'
So the " sudden death" that has swept the globe , reports of young people dying in record numbers, young athletes dropping like flies , are just what? incidental to you?
you're very cynical richard.. there is a place for that and maybe it is here.. i am not sure.. i know someone directly affected by the vaccine and it involves the heart... that is not a study, but i know he has had confirmation of this from the doctors... i don't know what the % of people affected adversely by the vaccine, but i do believe it is much higher then previous vaccine rates.. that is alarming in itself, but it is kept quiet for the public.. this also explains all the censorship... how do you blow that off here? you haven't acknowledged any of it in your commentary..
I remember a medical student I knew referred to "anecdotal - i.e., worthless - evidence." A basic problem with most people these days is that they no longer - if they ever did - have any concept of either "evidence" or "proof." As far as I can remember, such concepts are never taught in any educational setting outside of STEM courses, and certainly not in the lower grades. So we have a population that can't imagine what these concepts are and are incapable of using them properly.
You just said "you don't know what the % of people affected adversely by the vaccine" but then said "I do believe it is much higher than previous vaccine rates."
There are two problems with those statements:
1) You admit not having any figures. despite that, you believe something to be true. One has to then ask: based on what, if not figures? Articles like these - which also never cite any figures?
2) If it is true that the rate is higher than previous vaccines, it does not then follow either that this is not offset by the number of lives saved from death by the vaccines - in which case it can be argued that the increased risk is justified - or that the vaccines were engineered with the intent of increasing death by vaccine.
As I have to keep pointing out to people, "connect-the-dots evidence" is not actual evidence. It is speculation. It may be speculation worthy of investigation, but it is not evidence and it is not proof.
As an example, Mercouris the other day listed a series of events involving Putin doing this and that and then Prigozhin ends up dead. He points out that you could interpret those Putin events as all being connected to Prigozhin's death - and many people are. But he also correctly noted that they prove absolutely nothing because they could all have equally prosaic explanations which, in the absence of Prigozhin's death, would have been explained as something entirely different. Mercouris, as a lawyer, understands the distinction between evidence and proof - even though most lawyers exist to blur and degrade those distinctions in favor of their client.
This is the fundamental flaw in all conspiracy theories. But these days everyone is so wrapped up in social media and thus trying to prove that they are intellectually superior to everyone else - a basic human drive - that they decide the best way to do that is to latch on to some idea (either their own or more likely someone else's since most of these people are incapable of coming up with their own ideas by definition) which is in opposition to the mainstream social thought of the day. Then they cherry-pick their facts from a few people with ostensibly valid credentials - who have the exact same agenda as they do, i.e, inflate their own importance for personal reasons - to support these notions. Then the notion gets picked up by a bunch of other people who are desperate for validation - and Wallah! We have QAnon, or Russiagate, or "Ukraine is winning".
And the people who are running things in this world just love this shit because it fractures the population into warring factions that can be manipulated by their emotions.
So the MSM seizes on one side or the other - whichever has the ostensible support of the PTB - and cancels anyone who is on the other side. So then everyone who is on that other side screams, "See, the cancellation is proof the notion is true!"
No, it's not. It's just another binary-thinking, "either-or" load of bullshit which is far away from the facts of the situation. If you come down on one side or the other without having adequate facts to base your opinion on, you become just another manipulated chimpanzee.
Climate change is another such control operation. I have no idea whether climate change is real because I'm not a climatologist - and neither is anyone else who isn't a climatologist or at least hasn't done their own extensive research into the subject.
Don't fall for this shit, James. Or do, I couldn't care less.
I should make this a Substack post... I'll add it to my post idea list since it's very important.
It’s people like you that give the globalists cover for what they are doing. You seem to be absolutely certain that the vaccines are totally safe and yet there have been numerous studies that show that they are actually killing and injuring people. I don’t know your bonafides that allow you to have a closed mind and not even consider the possibility that what they found in his mock trial was right.
You say that the studies were bogus and there is no evidence, but did you bother to look at this link? Lots of studies for you to look at.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-vaccines-scientific-proof-lethality/5767711
Nice straw man on Prigozhin.
the problems would be resolved if i was able to share the brent weinstein interview with steve kirsch and robert malone from 2020 i think where they lay out the stats on vaccine in a very clear and thorough manner and show that these mrna vaccines didn't respect the very low threshold that had been in place for many years on 'do no harm' and that type thinking.. just because i can't recite the shit here doesn't disprove what i am saying.. you're good with words richard, but you are sometimes lacking in imagination and unwilling or unable to consider a different viewpoint if it doesn't come in a nice package with all the details you demand... this is another result of youtube censorship... you really ought to be sensitive to this issue, but again for whatever reason, you are skipping over the role censorship has in all of this here...
yes, do make a substack post and we can continue the conversation there! cheers james