The most despicable regime on the planet that Occupies Palestine and are run by what some term Zionazis with plenty of reasons current and historic has now seen what they so proudly declared to be their Deterrence Weapon—overwhelming force to be visited onto any challenger to the Zionist Genocide Project—shattered by Iran’s well measured and
Yes! And of course, the same is true of Russian attacks in Ukraine. “Unlike the Zionists who prefer to attack and murder civilians, Iran chose to attack the military assets responsible for the Zionist attacks where Iran appears to be quite successful”.
I’m already a huge fan of Prof Michael Hudson but this interview that you pointed us to blows my mind! I was more or less acquainted with his biography but to hear him start the interview with his description of his work Fifty (!) years ago at the Hudson Institute sharing his research with the guy who became one of the architects of the Mossad and others who became key figures in the Zionist movement here and in Israel and the strategy that is being implemented as we watch - apparently all according to plan! I’m sure, Karl, that you got a kick out of hearing him suggest that the refugees of Gaza or better yet, the Zionist Jews of Israel could emigrate to Ukraine where Ashkenazi Jews originally fled from the pogroms at the turn of the last century (great minds think alike?😝) The entire interview is outstanding- I’ve bookmarked it in my “OMG” archive and plan to share it widely- thanks for the ’heads up’!
I've known most of Hudson's personal background for years, although there were some embellishments I hadn't heard before. As for where the people go, they'll need to go somewhere, and it's the Jews who've already started as of 7 October. Many more will now leave and take their capital with them further harming the Zionist economy. Mike's been getting blunter as he nears 90. His status as a "celebrity" is higher now than ever as he gets asked for at least one interview weekly, and more know of him as a result that will expose more to his very important research and resulting books.
My personal fantasy these days is that the Jews get a contiguous territory going from Tel Aviv down to near Eilat at the tip of the Gulf of Aqaba and the Palestinians get all the rest, also contiguous. (The split Palestinian territory paradigm proposed in the 1940's was a disgrace back then and still a disgrace today.) Then Israel can set up a major port in Gaza, with possibly a canal extension from Red Sea via near Eilat to Gaza to rival the Suez canal, plus exploit the huge gas deposits in the Sea nearby - 25% gross income of which goes to Palestinian people in perpetuity based on simple calculation of cubic meters harvested - and have a viable, vibrant State which will integrate with BRI and no longer need US or other European support.
Meanwhile the Palestinians will have a contiguous territory from around Jerusalem also down to around Eilat, and all the way up to Lebanon and Syria. Jerusalem could be set up with a small sacred core similar to the Vatican run by an international consortium of the Abrahamic Religions, a non-state Protectorate.
It's either that or pretty much ALL Palestinians or ALL Jews have to be exiled. No matter the settlement, there is going to be considerable dislocation and many dissatisfied people. So nothing can happen there until a cease fire is imposed by an international military consortium, either UN or Middle East Region, ideally with the consent of both Israel and Palestine. Israel cannot be trusted to keep any agreement made so any sort of settlement without an occupation force in place for at least 20 years is a non-starter.
Also, Jordan could greatly benefit from the Canal Idea above in that it could serve as the main overland conduit for trade from the East into Syria, Lebanon and Western Iraq. Plus Christians will have free access to Bethlehem and Nazareth which can be developed for pilgrimage tourism. And Syria and Lebanon will no longer have a hostile Jewish state on its border. Israel will border Sinai on the West and Palestine in the South, East and North.
It would have been easy for US, UK and France to condemn the attack on embassy in UN. That they did not suggests they are onboard with destroying the rule of law globally. In that sense, Iran's response being "legal" is irrelevant. The bigger issue, however, is that Humpty Dumpty won't be going back together again.
Looking at the past few decades, the US sows chaos. One would have to assume that is the point. I don't believe for a second that Biden won't help Israel attack Iran. This is, after all, a long term policy of the US. Reality does set in, and there is the possibility that the US really cannot help much, but that doesn't mean US cannot sow more chaos. In that sense, an aircraft carrier going down is perfectly fine.
Brian Berletic picks up on this line of sowing chaos, too.
It is a big mistake to hand over control of your business to loudmouthed shysters with criminal records and completely irrational worldviews.
But what has been done cannot be undone-for better or worse the reputation and fate of the Empire has been handed off to a coterie of chancers and thugs, caught between homelands. All that can be done is to disempower those who sold their people to Israel and racism but first we need to wake up.
What has it got? Control over western europe-and the former British Empire- so complete that Hitler would be envious and Napoleon incredulous.
Equally if not superior domination over the American people and the vast continental landmass from the Arctic to the Mexican Gulf.
Cgiven that the burden of repaying the debt falls on the people rather than those who incurred it and profited from it, I'd say the American ruling class have made a pretty good bargain.
Yes! And of course, the same is true of Russian attacks in Ukraine. “Unlike the Zionists who prefer to attack and murder civilians, Iran chose to attack the military assets responsible for the Zionist attacks where Iran appears to be quite successful”.
I’m already a huge fan of Prof Michael Hudson but this interview that you pointed us to blows my mind! I was more or less acquainted with his biography but to hear him start the interview with his description of his work Fifty (!) years ago at the Hudson Institute sharing his research with the guy who became one of the architects of the Mossad and others who became key figures in the Zionist movement here and in Israel and the strategy that is being implemented as we watch - apparently all according to plan! I’m sure, Karl, that you got a kick out of hearing him suggest that the refugees of Gaza or better yet, the Zionist Jews of Israel could emigrate to Ukraine where Ashkenazi Jews originally fled from the pogroms at the turn of the last century (great minds think alike?😝) The entire interview is outstanding- I’ve bookmarked it in my “OMG” archive and plan to share it widely- thanks for the ’heads up’!
I've known most of Hudson's personal background for years, although there were some embellishments I hadn't heard before. As for where the people go, they'll need to go somewhere, and it's the Jews who've already started as of 7 October. Many more will now leave and take their capital with them further harming the Zionist economy. Mike's been getting blunter as he nears 90. His status as a "celebrity" is higher now than ever as he gets asked for at least one interview weekly, and more know of him as a result that will expose more to his very important research and resulting books.
My personal fantasy these days is that the Jews get a contiguous territory going from Tel Aviv down to near Eilat at the tip of the Gulf of Aqaba and the Palestinians get all the rest, also contiguous. (The split Palestinian territory paradigm proposed in the 1940's was a disgrace back then and still a disgrace today.) Then Israel can set up a major port in Gaza, with possibly a canal extension from Red Sea via near Eilat to Gaza to rival the Suez canal, plus exploit the huge gas deposits in the Sea nearby - 25% gross income of which goes to Palestinian people in perpetuity based on simple calculation of cubic meters harvested - and have a viable, vibrant State which will integrate with BRI and no longer need US or other European support.
Meanwhile the Palestinians will have a contiguous territory from around Jerusalem also down to around Eilat, and all the way up to Lebanon and Syria. Jerusalem could be set up with a small sacred core similar to the Vatican run by an international consortium of the Abrahamic Religions, a non-state Protectorate.
It's either that or pretty much ALL Palestinians or ALL Jews have to be exiled. No matter the settlement, there is going to be considerable dislocation and many dissatisfied people. So nothing can happen there until a cease fire is imposed by an international military consortium, either UN or Middle East Region, ideally with the consent of both Israel and Palestine. Israel cannot be trusted to keep any agreement made so any sort of settlement without an occupation force in place for at least 20 years is a non-starter.
Also, Jordan could greatly benefit from the Canal Idea above in that it could serve as the main overland conduit for trade from the East into Syria, Lebanon and Western Iraq. Plus Christians will have free access to Bethlehem and Nazareth which can be developed for pilgrimage tourism. And Syria and Lebanon will no longer have a hostile Jewish state on its border. Israel will border Sinai on the West and Palestine in the South, East and North.
It would have been easy for US, UK and France to condemn the attack on embassy in UN. That they did not suggests they are onboard with destroying the rule of law globally. In that sense, Iran's response being "legal" is irrelevant. The bigger issue, however, is that Humpty Dumpty won't be going back together again.
Looking at the past few decades, the US sows chaos. One would have to assume that is the point. I don't believe for a second that Biden won't help Israel attack Iran. This is, after all, a long term policy of the US. Reality does set in, and there is the possibility that the US really cannot help much, but that doesn't mean US cannot sow more chaos. In that sense, an aircraft carrier going down is perfectly fine.
Brian Berletic picks up on this line of sowing chaos, too.
The second shoe has dropped.
Russia took NATO.
Iran took Israel.
Nazism is done.
Those words look good, but let's make them 100% reality.
Thank you, also for the Link!
You are right.
This is the beginning of the end-game for Empire.
It is a big mistake to hand over control of your business to loudmouthed shysters with criminal records and completely irrational worldviews.
But what has been done cannot be undone-for better or worse the reputation and fate of the Empire has been handed off to a coterie of chancers and thugs, caught between homelands. All that can be done is to disempower those who sold their people to Israel and racism but first we need to wake up.
John Bolton is reputed to have said 'deterrence failed'. It is not Israeli deterrence but the empire's deterrence that is now a sham.
How could I agree with Bolton?
I do and it is time to go into what that means.
What has US got for $24 trillion in debt!
What has it got? Control over western europe-and the former British Empire- so complete that Hitler would be envious and Napoleon incredulous.
Equally if not superior domination over the American people and the vast continental landmass from the Arctic to the Mexican Gulf.
Cgiven that the burden of repaying the debt falls on the people rather than those who incurred it and profited from it, I'd say the American ruling class have made a pretty good bargain.
what good is west europe? as to former brit empire what good is canada and bermuda?
yup, the peeps are on the hook!
Nit: $34 T