Applying the methods of historical truth to the SMO is apt. Starting with “the Russian invasion of Ukraine”, a rhetorical invention which is the opposite of the truth, but is now a coinage permeating Western discourse. The proper representation of the sequence of events is the inverse of the current fable.
Applying the methods of historical truth to the SMO is apt. Starting with “the Russian invasion of Ukraine”, a rhetorical invention which is the opposite of the truth, but is now a coinage permeating Western discourse. The proper representation of the sequence of events is the inverse of the current fable.
For me the term ‘Nazi’ is problematic. The National Socialists were never socialist, completely the opposite.
‘Ethnofascist’ is more descriptively appropriate, literally correct, and applicable outside the German context.
Ancient Greek: εθνος ethnos group, band, body; race, sex; nation; people from common stock; clan; tribe; class by occupation/place in society; —indicating an elite group by race, religion, gender, social class, occupation, commercial ownership/solidarity, …
Fascist: Italian emblem of ‘the axe in sticks’, representing magistrates’ power to inflict corporal and capital punishment, thus gaining and maintaining rule by beating and killing; the exclusive ethnic elite, their bankers and commercial corporations controlling government.
Covert presupposition: the few are the relative master race; the many are the relatively socially subhuman others.
Orthodox [correct belief] entailment: habitual privileged elite dominance over and belligerence against the deprived, socially subhuman others.
Yes, lots of terminology needs to be overturned for an objective historical narrative to be constructed as well as the deliberately obfuscated exposed to Truth’s light. Some of that’s been done but remains esoteric relative to humanity’s understanding. IMO, the myths need to be exposed as myths and why they were made into unquestionable religious truths explained.
Applying the methods of historical truth to the SMO is apt. Starting with “the Russian invasion of Ukraine”, a rhetorical invention which is the opposite of the truth, but is now a coinage permeating Western discourse. The proper representation of the sequence of events is the inverse of the current fable.
For me the term ‘Nazi’ is problematic. The National Socialists were never socialist, completely the opposite.
‘Ethnofascist’ is more descriptively appropriate, literally correct, and applicable outside the German context.
Ancient Greek: εθνος ethnos group, band, body; race, sex; nation; people from common stock; clan; tribe; class by occupation/place in society; —indicating an elite group by race, religion, gender, social class, occupation, commercial ownership/solidarity, …
Fascist: Italian emblem of ‘the axe in sticks’, representing magistrates’ power to inflict corporal and capital punishment, thus gaining and maintaining rule by beating and killing; the exclusive ethnic elite, their bankers and commercial corporations controlling government.
Covert presupposition: the few are the relative master race; the many are the relatively socially subhuman others.
Orthodox [correct belief] entailment: habitual privileged elite dominance over and belligerence against the deprived, socially subhuman others.
Yes, lots of terminology needs to be overturned for an objective historical narrative to be constructed as well as the deliberately obfuscated exposed to Truth’s light. Some of that’s been done but remains esoteric relative to humanity’s understanding. IMO, the myths need to be exposed as myths and why they were made into unquestionable religious truths explained.